Yes or no? Two years after the US Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturned national abortion protections under Roe v. Wade, the debate still rages here in Florida. That, as voters now have a chance to take the Sunshine State from six weeks to just before viability. But only if they can get a supermajority to support a November ballot initiative.
It was a main focus in Tallahassee on Monday. Florida Democrats, the Biden-Harris Campaign, and others gathered under the shadow of a 20-foot-tall inflatable IUD to push for better access to contraceptives and approval of the Amendment Four abortion ballot initiative this November.
The effort seeks to eliminate almost every Florida abortion law on the books— including the current six-week restrictions, that have expectations for health, rape, incest, and human trafficking. If approved with at least 60% support, the constitutional amendment would return Florida to just before viability, about 24 weeks.
Mylissa Farmer was among the advocates at the press conference. The Missouri woman recounted her struggle to find abortion access after complications around 18 weeks into a pregnancy. The fetus was unlikely to survive, and her own life became a growing risk.
“It was terrifying," said Farmer. "I mean, there, there are no words for that experience of the security and that ironclad trust that you have in your healthcare system, that that got eroded very quickly.”
The abortion restrictions in her home state forced Farmer to travel over several days to Kansas, back to Missouri, and then finally to Illinois for treatment.
“If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone in this environment right now," she said. "And in my case, it's not uncommon for your water to break and have this situation.”
Florida's six-week ban was approved by the GOP-controlled legislature in 2023. It took effect only about two months ago, the law on hold, waiting for the Florida Supreme Court to review whether the state constitution's privacy protections covered abortion access. They ruled in favor of the law in April, triggering the restrictions targeting physicians to start May 1.
“There's nothing more important in my mind than protecting life,” said Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka (R-Ft. Myers) last year.
She helped craft the current six-week restriction and told us during a sitdown interview last year that Roe v. Wade’s overturn was an "opportunity" to— in her mind— save lives.
“We wouldn't be having this national debate if none of us were born,” said the lawmaker.
She is now among those seeking the defeat of Amendment Four this November. Gov. Ron DeSantis as well. In April, he came out against the ballot initiative and a bid for recreational marijuana.
“Once voters figure out how radical those are, they’re going to fail,” he said. "They are very, very extreme."
The formal effort, "Vote No on Four," calls the change "deceptive" and sweeping. The campaign says the initiative lacks definitions for things like "healthcare provider" which it has said makes the change too broad. Other concerns -- it preserves only parental "notification," not consent.
“Our opponents want to distract with inflatable gimmicks that have nothing to do with the dangerous and extreme Amendment 4," said Taryn Fenske, a spokeswoman for No on Four, in a statement. "If passed, Amendment 4 would strip away crucial medical safeguards, allow abortion clinic employees who aren’t doctors to approve late-term abortions for undefined health concerns, and allow abortions for minors without parental consent. Florida voters deserve the truth – Amendment 4 is not about reproductive rights – it’s about giving abortion clinics a rubber stamp to approve late-term abortions throughout the entire pregnancy.”
While the war of words continues, a fundraising battle is well underway. Yes on Four raised $19.8 million from April to mid-June, while Vote No raised only about $211,000. But Gov. DeSantis is also getting involved with the Florida Freedom Fund, which could become a sizable war chest with him as the frontman.
A South Tampa man turned to Susan Solves It after he said ADT told him he had to keep paying for a security system at his Hurricane Helene-damaged home, even though the system was so new that he never had a day of service.
